Here's the Reason Behind the Proposed Law Requiring Speed Limiters in Cars

Speeding-related accidents claim the lives of around 32 people daily in the United States, based on 2023 statistics from the National Safety Council. In response, Wisconsin lawmakers are exploring measures to reduce these fatalities and injuries by targeting drivers with a history of reckless behavior.

A bill introduced on October 23, 2025, proposes mandating speed-limiting devices for drivers who have accumulated at least two reckless driving convictions within a five-year period. These devices would remain installed for one year, restricting speed to no more than 20 miles above the posted limit. The goal is to hold repeat offenders accountable while promoting safer driving habits.

The initiative is modeled on the principle that monitoring driving behavior can improve safety, similar to how apps that track speed encourage more responsible driving. Proponents argue that this approach protects the public without unduly punishing otherwise safe drivers.

Wisconsins Traffic Safety Context

Data from LendingTree in 2025 highlights Wisconsin as the fifth state for speed-related incidents and 15th for overall driving incidents. Drivers required to use these devices must cover installation and maintenance costs for the year, which could reach up to $1,700, though financial assistance may be available for those in need. Tampering with the device could result in fines or jail time.

The bill is sponsored by Senator Chris Larson, known for advocating progressive policies, and Representative Russell Goodwin, who has experience in private law enforcement. The legislation is currently under discussion and has not yet become law.

Debate Over Speed Limiters

Supporters of the bill emphasize its potential to reduce accidents by limiting the actions of drivers who have already demonstrated dangerous behavior. The measure allows these drivers to maintain some independence while still facing consequences.

Opponents raise concerns about cost, privacy, and emergency situations where exceeding the speed limit may be necessary. They suggest alternatives such as more widespread use of speed cameras. The device would still allow speeds up to 20 miles per hour above the limit for urgent circumstances.

For drivers with a safe record, no changes would occur, though overall road safety could improve. For repeat offenders, these devices may become a mandatory part of their vehicles.

Author: Noah Whitman